Platform12 min read

A guide to the EN 15804 result tables: how to read Tables 8, 9, 11, 12, 13

The numerical core of an EPD is five result tables: core impact, additional impact, resource use, waste and output flows. What they mean, row by row.

By Last updated

Numbered result tables laid out in sequence across a wide desk

The numerical core of an EN 15804+A2 EPD is five result tables. Each shares the same skeleton: indicators as rows, life cycle modules (A1-A3, A4, A5, B1-B7, C1-C4, D) as columns. The verifier looks at these tables first; the architect or certification consultant pulls data from them into the building calculation. Reading them correctly is the precondition for using the EPD correctly.

Table 8 — core environmental impact indicators

The 13 mandatory indicators: GWP-total and its three components (GWP-fossil, GWP-biogenic, GWP-luluc), ODP (ozone depletion), AP (acidification), three eutrophication indicators (EP-freshwater, EP-marine, EP-terrestrial), POCP (photochemical ozone), ADP-minerals&metals, ADP-fossil and WDP (water use). All computed with EF v3.1 characterisation factors. The most common reading mistake: confusing GWP-total with GWP-fossil — for products storing biogenic carbon the two diverge substantially.

Table 9 — additional environmental impact indicators

A single results table page with crisp ruled rows and columns

Particulate matter (PM), ionising radiation (IRP), ecotoxicity (ETP-fw), human toxicity (HTP-c carcinogenic, HTP-nc non-carcinogenic) and soil quality (SQP). These are mandatory to declare, but EN 15804+A2 adds an explicit caveat: toxicity results carry high uncertainty and are not recommended for comparison. The verifier checks that this disclaimer appears in the EPD.

Table 11 — resource use

Reports energy and material inputs: PERE/PERM/PERT (renewable primary energy: as energy / embedded in material / total), PENRE/PENRM/PENRT (the non-renewable counterparts), SM (secondary material), RSF/NRSF (secondary fuels) and FW (fresh water). The PERM and PENRM rows carry what most readers skip: energy stored inside the material — biomass energy in timber, fossil feedstock in plastics. Computed via the CED methodology, these rows also indicate energy-recovery potential at end of life.

Table 12 — waste categories

Three rows: HWD (hazardous waste), NHWD (non-hazardous waste), RWD (radioactive waste). The RWD row usually surprises — it comes from electricity mixes with nuclear shares and is not expected to be zero. A product made on the French grid shows visibly higher RWD than the Turkish grid; that is not an error but the mix's signature.

Table 13 — output flows

CRU (components for re-use), MFR (materials for recycling), MER (materials for energy recovery) and EE (exported energy). This table documents the mass bookkeeping of your end-of-life scenario in C3/C4 and the inputs to the module D calculation. If your MFR row is 0 while module D declares a recycling benefit, the verifier catches it in the first round.

  • Columns in every table are limited to the selected modules; undeclared modules are marked "MND"
  • GWP-total = GWP-fossil + GWP-biogenic + GWP-luluc — check the sum
  • Table 9 toxicity indicators are not used for comparison (high-uncertainty caveat)
  • Table 13 MFR/MER values form the mass basis of module D benefits
  • Units change between tables: kg CO₂eq, MJ, kg, m³ — carry the unit when copying

Tags

  • EN 15804 tables
  • EPD result tables
  • GWP-fossil
  • resource use indicators
  • waste categories
  • output flows