What is the circular economy? And how is it measured with LCA?
Circularity is not an environmental benefit in itself — it has to be measured. When recycling wins, and when it does not.
By clca Editorial TeamLast updated
The circular economy is a production and consumption model aiming to keep materials in the economy as long as possible and at as high a value as possible. Its opposite is the linear model: take, make, use, dispose.
The R-hierarchy: recycling is not the best option
Recycling is what comes to mind first, yet it sits fairly low in the hierarchy, which is ordered by how much of the material’s value is preserved.
- Refuse / rethink — is the product needed at all, can the function be met another way
- Reduce — delivering the same function with less material
- Reuse — using the product again as it is; the highest value retention
- Repair and refurbish — extending life, dividing production impact across more uses
- Remanufacture — collecting components and restoring them to new-product standard
- Recycle — melting and reforming the material; part of the value is lost
- Energy recovery — burning it for energy; the material value is lost entirely
Circularity is not automatically good
This is the point that meets the most resistance and matters the most. Recycling also consumes energy: collection, transport, sorting, cleaning, reprocessing. If that chain’s total impact exceeds primary material production, recycling loses environmentally.
In aluminium, recycling uses about a twentieth of the energy of primary production — an enormous gain. For some low-density, contaminated plastics collected over long distances the balance is far finer. The answer depends on the material, the distance and collection efficiency — on measurement, not ideology.
How LCA measures circularity
There are two basic approaches, and they give different answers for the same product. Under cut-off, recycled input carries only collection and reprocessing burden; the primary production burden stays with the first user. Under avoided burden, the recycling credit goes to whoever sends the material for recycling.
EN 15804+A2 uses cut-off and reports end-of-life recovery potential separately in Module D. That separation is critical: Module D’s negative value cannot be netted off the A1-A3 total, because that benefit lies outside the system boundary and is an assumption about the future.
Measurable circularity indicators
- Recycled content share — the secondary material fraction of the input
- Recyclability rate — the share recoverable at end-of-life
- Reference service life — how many years the product performs
- Number of reuses — decisive in refillable systems
- Resource use indicators — primary and secondary material, renewable and fossil energy
Tags
- circular economy
- recycled content
- Module D
- end-of-life scenario
- resource efficiency
- fundamentals
Related reading
All articles in Fundamentals- Fundamentals
What is Zero Waste? The regulation, the certificate and the link to LCA
In Turkey, Zero Waste is not a campaign but a system mandated by regulation. Who it covers, how the certificate works, and how the waste data feeds an LCA.
9 min read - Data & Methods
Scenario analysis: how end-of-life assumptions decide the result
Nobody knows what recycling infrastructure will look like in fifty years. How to work with that uncertainty and report scenarios honestly.
10 min read - Fundamentals
What is an EIA, and how does it differ from LCA?
The two most commonly confused concepts. One is a permitting process, the other a measurement method — and neither substitutes for the other.
9 min read - Fundamentals
What is a life cycle inventory (LCI)?
LCI is the phase where every flow in and out of the system is counted. An LCA’s quality is decided here — and so is most of its effort.
10 min read