What is greenwashing? Seven common forms
Most greenwashing is not deliberate falsehood but unsubstantiated good intent. Which claims carry risk, and how to make them defensible.
By clca Editorial TeamLast updated
Greenwashing is presenting a product’s or organisation’s environmental performance as better than it is. The word suggests bad faith, but most cases are not deliberate falsehood; they are unsubstantiated, unmeasured or badly framed good intent. The distinction does not help — to a regulator or a consumer, both land in the same place.
Seven common forms
- Hidden trade-off — highlighting an improvement in one dimension while omitting the one that worsened, such as recycled packaging that is twice as heavy
- Unsubstantiated claim — saying ‘eco-friendly’ with no measurement or verification behind it
- Vagueness — undefined terms such as ‘green’, ‘clean’ or ‘natural’; any adjective whose meaning is left to the reader
- Irrelevant truth — technically accurate but meaningless, such as stressing the absence of a substance banned years ago
- Lesser of two evils — claiming relative superiority within an already high-impact category
- Fake label — a badge you designed yourself that resembles an official certification
- Scale shifting — presenting an improvement in one product as the whole company’s performance
The rules are tightening
ISO 14021 requires self-declared environmental claims to be verifiable, specific and non-misleading; blanket phrases such as ‘environmentally friendly’ are explicitly not accepted. On the EU side, the Green Claims Directive establishes a regime requiring environmental marketing claims to be substantiated in advance and independently verified.
Turkish advertising legislation likewise covers misleading environmental claims, and the Advertising Board can impose administrative sanctions on them. The risk is not only reputational.
How to make a claim defensible
- Be specific — not ‘low carbon’ but ‘320 kg CO₂e per tonne (A1-A3, EN 15804+A2)’
- State the comparison basis — lower than what: your previous product, or the sector average
- State the system boundary — do not present a cradle-to-gate figure as cradle-to-grave
- State the scope — one product, a product family, or the whole company
- Do not rest on a single indicator — if you cut carbon and raised water use, say both
- Get it verified — an independently verified EPD is the strongest defence available
Tags
- greenwashing
- environmental claim
- ISO 14021
- carbon neutral
- consumer law
- fundamentals
Related reading
All articles in Fundamentals- Fundamentals
What is ISO 14001? And why it does not replace LCA
ISO 14001 is a management system standard, not a measurement method. Why your customer still asks for an EPD even when you hold the certificate.
10 min read - Corporate Carbon
Carbon neutral, net zero, climate neutral: what the claims actually require
Three terms, three different evidence requirements. Offsetting mechanisms, the permanence problem and where greenwashing begins.
10 min read - Fundamentals
What is an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)?
An EPD presents a product’s environmental performance in a standard format, independently verified. What it says, what it does not, and why buyers ask for one.
10 min read - Fundamentals
What is an EIA, and how does it differ from LCA?
The two most commonly confused concepts. One is a permitting process, the other a measurement method — and neither substitutes for the other.
9 min read