Sensitivity analysis: which assumption is actually carrying the result?
An LCA result is only as solid as its weakest assumption. One-at-a-time scans, hotspot analysis and how this differs from uncertainty.
By clca Editorial TeamLast updated
A life cycle assessment rests on dozens of assumptions: transport distances, electricity mix, service lives, recycling rates, allocation choices. They are not equally important. Sensitivity analysis shows which ones actually carry the result.
Sensitivity and uncertainty are not the same
Uncertainty analysis asks how much spread known input distributions produce in the output; Monte Carlo simulation is its typical tool. Sensitivity analysis asks a different question: how much does the result move if I change this parameter? The first measures uncertainty, the second finds the levers.
The two are complementary, but sensitivity analysis is usually more useful because it suggests an action directly: improve the data behind the parameter that carries the result.
One-at-a-time scanning
The simplest and most common method is changing each parameter individually by a set proportion — typically ten or twenty per cent — and measuring the resulting change. The output is a list ranking parameters by the size of their effect, and that list sets your data collection priorities directly.
- Electricity emission factor — almost always first for energy-intensive processes
- Main raw material quantity and source
- Transport distance — decisive for low-density or heavy products
- Product life and replacement frequency — critical in whole-life calculations
- Recycling rate — large effect in Module D and under the cut-off approach
- Allocation method — can reverse the result on its own in multi-output systems
Mandatory in comparative studies
In a study comparing two products, sensitivity analysis is not optional. If the difference in the result is ten per cent while a critical parameter moves thirty per cent across its plausible range, the comparison is meaningless. ISO 14044 requires such checks for comparative assertions disclosed to the public.
The practical rule: if you cannot show the difference exceeds the swing from the most sensitive parameter's plausible range, it is more honest to say the two products are equivalent.
Tags
- sensitivity analysis
- uncertainty analysis
- data quality
- hotspot analysis
- LCA methodology
- scenario analysis
Related reading
All articles in Data & Methods- Platform
Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis in LCA: from the pedigree matrix to P10/P90
A single-number GWP result hides the uncertainty behind it. The chain from pedigree matrix to lognormal distribution to the P10/P90 band.
11 min read - Data & Methods
LCI databases: choosing between ecoinvent, EF and sector datasets
Choosing a background database is not a technical detail but a methodological decision that changes the result. Coverage, system models and why you must not mix.
11 min read - Data & Methods
Primary and secondary data: which to collect for which line
Modelling everything with primary data is neither possible nor necessary. The foreground-background split and allocating a data collection budget well.
10 min read - Data & Methods
Scenario analysis: how end-of-life assumptions decide the result
Nobody knows what recycling infrastructure will look like in fifty years. How to work with that uncertainty and report scenarios honestly.
10 min read