What is sustainability reporting? The frameworks, and who must comply
GRI, CSRD/ESRS, ISSB, CDP — which are voluntary, which mandatory, and what each asks for. Plus how product data feeds them.
By clca Editorial TeamLast updated
Sustainability reporting is a company’s structured public disclosure of its environmental, social and governance performance. For twenty years it was a voluntary reputational exercise; in Europe it is now moving under the same regime as financial reporting — same report, same management responsibility, independent assurance.
The main frameworks
- GRI — the oldest and most widespread voluntary framework; broad stakeholder audience, impact-oriented
- CSRD / ESRS — Europe’s mandatory regime, covering companies above size thresholds; climate sits in ESRS E1
- ISSB (IFRS S1/S2) — an investor-focused global standard set built on financial materiality
- CDP — a questionnaire-based disclosure system filled in at investor and buyer request
- TCFD — a framework for financial disclosure of climate risk, largely absorbed by ISSB
Materiality: two different meanings
This is the most fundamental difference between frameworks. ISSB looks at financial materiality: does this topic affect the company’s value? CSRD requires double materiality: a topic is reported if it affects the company’s value or if the company has a significant impact on it. The second condition widens scope considerably.
You are affected even when out of scope
CSRD directly covers only large companies. But their Scope 3 data comes from suppliers. A Turkish producer selling to a European customer faces product-level emissions data requests because of the customer’s obligation, even if they are not in scope themselves.
The request arrives not as a questionnaire but as a field in a supplier portal: kg CO₂e per product, verification status, data source. A supplier who cannot fill it is represented by a sector average in the customer’s report — and the average is almost always worse than actual performance.
How product data feeds the report
A corporate report is annual and company-wide; LCA is per product. The link is made at two points: the footprints of materials you buy feed Scope 3 Category 1; the use and end-of-life impact of products you sell feed Categories 11 and 12. Two cuts through the same data pool.
Assurance: the report’s hidden cost
Under mandatory regimes the report is subject to independent assurance — the data path behind the figures is audited. That requires sustainability data to be managed like financial data: source documents, calculation steps, approval records, versioning. A dataset assembled in spreadsheets at year-end does not pass.
Tags
- sustainability reporting
- CSRD
- GRI
- double materiality
- fundamentals
Related reading
All articles in Fundamentals- Fundamentals
What is ESG? Environmental, social and governance criteria
ESG is not a label but an assessment framework. What the three letters measure, who asks, and where the data behind the E actually comes from.
10 min read - Corporate Carbon
CSRD and ESRS E1: the data requirements of climate reporting
ESRS E1 defines what climate data must be reported and in what detail. Double materiality, transition plans and the Scope 3 requirement.
12 min read - Fundamentals
What is a greenhouse gas? Which gases count, and where they come from
Carbon dioxide is not alone. Where methane, N₂O and fluorinated gases come from in industry, and why small masses create large shares.
9 min read - Fundamentals
What is a carbon footprint? Product, organisation and personal
One term covers three different things, and confusing them breaks the arithmetic. The boundaries and units of product, corporate and personal footprints.
10 min read